Date: Sep 14, 2023
Click Count: 97
HW-USBN-2A is an ispDOWNLOAD cable product that provides hardware connectivity for in-system programming of all Lattice devices. It is primarily used to support the programming and configuration of Lattice FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array) and CPLD (Complex Programmable Logic Device) devices. After completing the logic design and creating programming files using Lattice Diamond, ispLEVER Classic, or PAC-Designer software, you can program the devices directly on the PC board using Lattice Diamond Programmer or Lattice's ispVM system software. No additional components are required for device programming.
HW-USBN-2B programming cable is a hardware connection for in-system programming of all Lattice devices. It is also used to support the programming and configuration of Lattice FPGA and CPLD devices. This programming cable is used for bidirectional communication with software tools such as Reveal Logic Analyzer and MicoSystem Debugger. In addition, the performance of HW-USBN-2B has been improved by a factor of 3 to 10 times, offering I2C support, improved iCE programming support, and more.
1.Purpose: Provides hardware connectivity for in-system programming of Lattice devices.
2.Design Prototyping and Debugging: Ideal choice.
3.Manufacturer: Both are produced by LatN/Ace Semiconductor.
4.Lead-Free Status: Compliant.
5.RoHS Standard: Compliant.
6.REACH SVHC Compliance: No highly concerned substances.
7.Is it easy to operate: Easy to use.
1.Model: HW-USBN-2A and HW-USBN-2B are different models of programming cables.
2.Price Difference: HW-USBN-2B is slightly more expensive than HW-USBN-2A, estimated at around $225, while HW-USBN-2A is around $191.544.
3.Voltage Range: HW-USBN-2A is 1.2-5V, while HW-USBN-2B is 1.2-3.3V.
4.Components: HW-USBN-2A includes the ispDownload USB cable, whereas HW-USBN-2B includes 8POS adapters and 10POS (2x5) adapters.
Speed and Performance: If you require faster data transfer speeds and more connectivity options, HW-USBN-2B may be a more suitable choice because it offers swifter data transfer rates and additional USB-C ports.
Budget: If you are working within a constrained budget, HW-USBN-2A might be the preferable option, even though it may slightly lag behind HW-USBN-2B in certain aspects.
Functional Requirements: Consider your device connectivity needs. If you necessitate more USB-C ports or specific functionalities, opt for the model that aligns with your requirements.
Aesthetics and Design: If you prioritize the appearance and design of your USB hub, you can contemplate which model better aligns with your aesthetic preferences.
In conclusion, both HW-USBN-2A and HW-USBN-2B have their respective advantages. The choice between them depends on your specific needs and priorities. If speed and functionality are of paramount importance to you, HW-USBN-2B may be the more suitable option. Conversely, if cost-effectiveness is your primary concern, then HW-USBN-2A might be the better choice.
<< Next: Xilinx Spartan 6 vs Spartan 7 FPGA Faceoff: Your Guide to Selection
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Support